Archive for May, 2006

Going to Tax Court

Wednesday, May 24th, 2006

Joe Monaco and I spend a good deal of time handling cases before the Tax Court of Canada because sometimes the CRA just will not listen to reason. Before filing an appeal, however, the client should understand something about the process. To that end, the following table provides a simplified outline of a General Procedure income tax appeal. (more…)

Amendments to the CA Act

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

Our readers who are CAs will be aware that Ontario has amended the Chartered Accountants Act, 1956 to permit professional corporations to be partners in limited liability partnerships. The amendments are effective May 18, 2006. The Chartered Accountants of Ontario website has details.

Some Notes on CDA

Saturday, May 6th, 2006

Calculating CDA

Canada’s income tax system aspires to “neutrality” so that, in theory, an individual should be indifferent about whether he earns income directly or through a corporation. The CDA is one of the mechanisms employed to achieve this neutrality. (more…)

Food stamps for clients

Monday, May 1st, 2006

A real estate agent provides vouchers for food and entertainment to his clients. The agent does not control how the clients use the vouchers, and he does not consume the food or attend the entertainments provided by the vouchers. Can he deduct in full the amounts spent on the vouchers, notwithstanding the provisions of section 67.1 of the Income Tax Act (Canada)? In The Queen v. Stapley, 2006 FCA 36, the Court said no, the 50% rule applies.

The Charter and the Tax Court

Monday, May 1st, 2006

Subsection 171(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the Act) sets out the jurisdiction of the Tax Court in income tax appeals. In general, the subsection does not permit the Tax Court to review the process by which the Minister arrives at an assessment. Rather, the Tax Court is empowered to determine only whether the amount of tax assessed is correct. It appears that even the Charter of Rights does not change this position: see Burrows v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 761 (not yet available online). (more…)


Hamilton t: 905.528.8411 f: 905.528.9008
Burlington t: 905.639.1052 f: 905.333.3960